COMMUNITY

You might want to call your local golf club builder. If you have a Golfsmith or Edwin Watts, thats where I would start.

Here's an excerpt from a Golfwrx review. The 64 MTS is a made-for-Mizuno thing, not the same shaft. That could be good, or that could be bad. Here's the clip:

The stock shaft might have been the most impressive aspect of this club. It is a 64gram “Made for Mizuno” Fubuki. Now, 99% of the made for shafts in drivers are watered down versions of the original, but this one is actually a beefed up version of the 63gram Fubuki Tour. I’ve hit the original Fubuki Tour in the 63 and 73 grams shafts and the “Made for Mizuno” Fubuki I actually liked better. Mizuno had Mitsubishi beef up the tip section a little bit, thus lowering the launch, torque and tightening up the feel. I was honestly blown away with how good this shaft felt and performed. It maintained Fubuki’s low spin, and amazing carry distance, but dropped launch angle a little and firmed up the feel. I still got that surprising distance out of the shaft with better overall performance.

Here's an excerpt from a Golfwrx review. The 64 MTS is a made-for-Mizuno thing, not the same shaft. That could be good, or that could be bad. Here's the clip:

The stock shaft might have been the most impressive aspect of this club. It is a 64gram “Made for Mizuno” Fubuki. Now, 99% of the made for shafts in drivers are watered down versions of the original, but this one is actually a beefed up version of the 63gram Fubuki Tour. I’ve hit the original Fubuki Tour in the 63 and 73 grams shafts and the “Made for Mizuno” Fubuki I actually liked better. Mizuno had Mitsubishi beef up the tip section a little bit, thus lowering the launch, torque and tightening up the feel. I was honestly blown away with how good this shaft felt and performed. It maintained Fubuki’s low spin, and amazing carry distance, but dropped launch angle a little and firmed up the feel. I still got that surprising distance out of the shaft with better overall performance.